Maysa's Blog

Blog of a mining passionate about Internet and technology addict. Matters that are part of my day to day.


Nofollow for you too, Wikipedia

January 30, 2007 Category: indigo-Nation Enviar este texto por e-mail Send this text by e-mail



Who works with Internet read in the past few days that Wikipedia put the code nofollow on all outbound links from the site. This means that for Google, for example, a link to a site on Wikipedia does not have any relevance and will not count in the standings. Every time you put a url and link rel = "nofollow", search engines will ignore the reference.

Unfair it. Sites have linked to Wikipedia and I know that these references help the pagerank in the search result, etc.. They're using Spam? Then solve it another way, striking out the spammers.

Therefore, I will adopt the "principle of reciprocity virtual" I found here . My links to Wikipedia (which are many) will have a nofollow as well. Thus, it is fair.

I installed this plugin in less than 2 minutes. Just download , unzip and send it to the / wp-content/plugins via FTP. Then go to the editor plugin for your blog / wp-admin/plugins.php and activate it. Ready. Works like a charm, you can see the source code of this page .

Maysa

Related posts:

    When using nofollow?
    Things you should not do while you participate in Adsense
    Want to popularity? Buy comments
    Vírtua outside air also
    Of course also other is equal to

8 comments on "Nofollow for you too, Wikipedia"


  1. Until then our only problem was Wikipedia and this charade, now wait to see what Google will do through KNOL.

    Pagerank 2 will be a miracle!

    A
  2. Hello Cilene
    This only for links to Wikipedia.
    Hugs
    Maysa

    2
  3. This plugin is for all the links or just to Wikipedia?

    3
  4. Great, thanks for answering the questions.

    4
  5. Hello Lucas
    Answering your second question:
    My sites linked on Wikipedia were on average 50% made by me and 50% added by third parties.

    I do not know if it exists, does not seek fame, not reprogram, so I have no idea how it can be resolved. I leave to the experts, this issue.

    Thank you for your visit :)
    Maysa

    5
  6. Question number one: who put the link to their sites on wikipedia? Do you or do not know who put it?

    Question number two: There is another way to solve the problem of spamindex? If there is and you know, tell us and you'll be famous because WELL Are we looking for alternatives and discussing the world and so far nobody has even come close to solving the problem of spamindexing. The only solution so far is to put nofollow on the links.

    7
  7. After the problems we already have in real life, it's time to inaugurate the "virtual diplomacy" xD

    A committee formed by leading bloggers of the world could have a meeting with those responsible for Wikipedia to address the issue. Parce that thousands (millions?) Of anonymous bloggers who touched on the subject did not head them.

    8

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. The ten best TV shows | Ljunior.com 13 07 07
  2. about: blank »Blog Archive» Wikipedia and nofollow: the final word 30 01 07

Leave a comment

Imagem CAPTCHA
Refresh Image
*
  • Collaborate!

  • Categories

  • File